Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jimmy Yang vs Issei Okamura Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Yang vs Okamura analysis and find out who is favored!
Jimmy Yang vs Issei Okamura Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Yang 0 - 0 Okamura
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Yang has won 43.74% of points on their second serve, while Okamura has won 44.98%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Yang, in recent form, has won 44.47% of their opponent's second serve points, while Okamura has won 52.51%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.74% and 30.41% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Yang has saved 54.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Okamura has saved 58.1% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Yang has won 38.78% of matches played (W/L 19/ 30), with Okamura winning 43.18% (W/L 19/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Yang has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 10/ 10), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 41% (W/L 11/ 16). Okamura has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 18% (W/L 2/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Yang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 18/ 27), where as Okamura has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.18% of matches (W/L 19/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Yang has played against opponents with an average rank of 144.33 while Okamura has played against players with an average rank of 59.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Yang has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Okamura has won 22% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Yang has converted 36.05% of breakpoint opportunities, and Okamura has converted 34.41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
789
Rank
709
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
870
Rank
574
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
46% (75-87)
Career Total W/L
47% (215-238)
29% (6-15)
YTD W/L
44% (12-15)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Jimmy Yang vs Issei Okamura For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Yang VS Okamura
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jimmy Yang | Issei Okamura |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 29% (6/15) | 44% (12/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 31% (15/33) | 47% (27/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (203/263) | 50% (263/268) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 23% (3/10) | 45% (10/12) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 40% (2/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.46 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 105 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0.4 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 91 | 33 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:2 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 107.05 | 84.81 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (685/1236) | 66% (607/916) |
| 1st Serve W% | 71% (483/685) | 64% (389/607) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (241/551) | 45% (139/309) |
| BPs Won% Total | 36% (31/86) | 34% (32/93) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (434/1248) | 39% (365/940) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 29% (6/15) | 44% (12/15) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 29% (6/21) | 44% (12/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 29% (2/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (9/6) | 86% (14/12) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (9/3) | 14% (14/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (12/0) | 0% (13/0) |
Jimmy Yang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Moerani Bouzige
Player
Jimmy Yang
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
10
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sheng Tang
Player
Jimmy Yang
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
7
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
93%
(
28 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jimmy Yang
Player
Yuquan Jin
46%
(
38 of
82)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
90)
9
Aces
8
9
Double Faults
8
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuquan Jin
Player
Jimmy Yang
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jimmy Yang
Player
Maximus Jones
51%
(
56 of
109)
1st Serve %
51%
(
57 of
112)
10
Aces
4
8
Double Faults
5
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
55%
(
29 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
110
|
7-6(4) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Woobin Shin
Player
Jimmy Yang
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
25 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sheng Tang
Player
Jimmy Yang
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
103)
3
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
103)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Jimmy Yang
66%
(
65 of
98)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Jimmy Yang
40%
(
23 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Keisuke Saitoh
Player
Jimmy Yang
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
56%
(
24 of
43)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
51
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Issei Okamura Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sheng Tang
Player
Issei Okamura
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Issei Okamura
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Issei Okamura
Player
Charlie Pade
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Naoki Tajima
Player
Issei Okamura
52%
(
55 of
105)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
6
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
2
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
40%
(
20 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
42%
(
44 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 3-6 10-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Kabir Hans
Player
Issei Okamura
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
2
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Dharmil Shah
Player
Issei Okamura
51%
(
37 of
73)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Yang Vs Okamura Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Yang are available here and Okamura photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
